Compliance SweepBack to stories →
← Back to stories

AB 2150 adds employer-paid naloxone training for employees required to certify in CPR

AB 2150 adds employer-paid naloxone training for California employees whose employer requires CPR certification. The September 20 law recognizes documented EMSA-equivalent training, limits EMSA's role to content approval, and states that education does not create an independent duty to administer medication or expand practice authority.

What happened

California enacted AB 2150 on September 20 as Chapter 384. An employer operating in California that requires CPR certification training must also require the affected employees to complete an EMSA-approved online video module on naloxone and pay the training cost. The module is separate from the CPR curriculum and must cover overdose recognition, appropriate emergency response, and proper administration of naloxone or another approved opioid antagonist. EMSA approves content against those minimum standards; the section does not assign it ongoing employer-compliance monitoring or enforcement.

An employee's existing CPR, first-aid, or other training can satisfy the requirement when EMSA determines it meets or exceeds the minimum content and the employer retains documentation. Existing clinical staffing or an internal medication policy alone does not exempt an employer, but the equivalent-training route remains available. The statute expressly creates no independent duty, authorization, or expectation to administer naloxone and preserves scope-of-practice, medication-administration, and delegation rules. It establishes a training floor and preserves broader or more protective requirements under other rulemaking authorities, rather than treating this module as proof of compliance with every workplace standard.

Scope and timing

Authority status
Final
Applicability
Directly applicable
Audience
Health systems, Provider networks
Jurisdiction
California
Recorded date
2027-01-01
Date type
effective

Why it matters

Clinical staffing or internal medication policies do not alone exempt an employer. The training requirement does not expand medication-administration authority or professional scope.

Sources

Complete edition and supplemental material

This finding in the complete approved report →

Regulatory horizons, CIA trends and implementation trackers remain in the full report.

Read the entire Compliance Sweep report →

← Return to stories

Privacy preferences

Where enabled for this site, Cloudflare Web Analytics can send page-use and performance measurements to Cloudflare. This panel provides information and does not turn analytics on or off.

This panel stores no tracking choice and does not change your tool saves, screening, resets, reports or exports. Other sites have separate settings.

Read Privacy & Cookies