Compliance SweepBack to stories →
← Back to stories

California changes disclosure rules for sexual orientation, gender identity, and intersex data

SB 1114 limits identifiable disclosures of sexual orientation, gender identity, and intersex information by enumerated California agencies and specified public higher-education institutions. The September 26 law preserves defined exceptions and minimum-necessary sharing, with distinct automation and Department of Social Services implementation provisions.

What happened

California chaptered SB 1114 on September 26 as Chapter 471. The amendments restrict disclosure of covered SOGISC information in personally identifiable form outside California state or local government or its authorized agents, subject to the listed exceptions. Covered information includes specified data reasonably capable of revealing transgender or intersex status, such as certain combinations of identity and birth-sex information and gender-marker records. The framework names the covered state agencies and incorporates disclosure restrictions for the identified public postsecondary institutions; it does not create a universal private-provider demographic-collection mandate.

Exceptions include mandatory federal or interstate program agreements, warrants or orders enforceable in California, designated public-health functions, qualifying protected vendor services, permitted Information Practices Act disclosures, and specified Civil Rights Department activities. Identifiable sharing must be limited to the minimum required by the applicable exception. For shared state-federal systems, the separation and limited-sharing duties become operative for each agency when it notifies the Legislature that the necessary automation is complete. Separately, DSS must comply with the identified external-disclosure restrictions as early as possible, no later than January 1, 2028. The DSS dated phase and shared-system automation trigger apply to different statutory requirements.

Scope and timing

Authority status
Final
Applicability
Directly applicable
Audience
Health systems, Provider networks
Jurisdiction
California
Recorded date
2027-01-01
Date type
effective

Why it matters

Privacy, data governance, patient access, analytics, and vendor workflows may handle the covered data and need consistent disclosure controls.

Sources

Complete edition and supplemental material

This finding in the complete approved report →

Regulatory horizons, CIA trends and implementation trackers remain in the full report.

Read the entire Compliance Sweep report →

← Return to stories

Privacy preferences

Where enabled for this site, Cloudflare Web Analytics can send page-use and performance measurements to Cloudflare. This panel provides information and does not turn analytics on or off.

This panel stores no tracking choice and does not change your tool saves, screening, resets, reports or exports. Other sites have separate settings.

Read Privacy & Cookies