DHCS draft outlines qualified-individual waiver pathways and safeguards
Oct 4, 2026 edition · GC-2026-0158 · Published 2026-10-04 · Version 2 · Draft
DHCS’s September 25 draft describes qualified-individual waiver routes with independence, conflict, approval and renewal safeguards.
What happened
DHCS and CDSS’s joint draft ACL/BHIN dated September 25 describes approval routes allowing specified placing-agency employees or people connected to placement settings to perform qualified-individual (QI) assessments despite the usual affiliation restriction. Existing QI qualifications, training and assessment guidance are not eliminated. Under the draft, a placing-agency employee cannot assess a child for whom they are or were the caseworker or sit in the relevant casework chain of command. A behavioral health plan (BHP) employee ordinarily needs no waiver unless the specified placement-setting or placing-agency connections exist. This remains draft guidance as of October 4.
The draft’s three BHP/provider routes vary who develops or submits the request, but retain BHP signatures, independence from placement-setting influence, training, attestations and an oversight plan. They do not create unrestricted approval for placement-setting staff to assess current or potential residents: the draft restricts concurrent placement-setting employment and requires tracking of conflicts and employment changes. CDSS would issue a written decision; approval lasts one year, renewal is requested at least sixty calendar days before expiration, and denied renewal disqualifies work under that waiver until a new approval. A separate case-specific tribal route is described, and waivers cannot be shared across counties. The retained dated draft does not establish the historical public-comment deadline; verify that deadline before any submission rather than treating the draft as an issued waiver.
Scope and timing
- Authority status
- Draft
- Applicability
- Operationally relevant
- Audience
- Health systems, Provider networks
- Jurisdiction
- California
- Affected functions
- Clinical Operations, Case Management, Legal
- Responsible owner
- Clinical Operations
Why it matters
Assessment independence depends on actual casework, employment and ownership relationships, with ongoing monitoring rather than a one-time affiliation waiver alone.
Recommended action
Assess the proposed route with child-welfare and behavioral-health partners, map conflicts, qualifications and oversight responsibilities, and verify the applicable comment deadline before considering a submission. Do not treat the draft as final guidance or an approved organizational waiver.
Implementation playbook
- Internal target: review the September 25 draft’s QI qualifications, independence, casework and employment conflicts, proposed request pathway and oversight responsibilities with operational and legal owners. Clinical Operations · Due 2026-10-09
- Internal target: verify the applicable public-comment deadline before any proposed submission, record the draft applicability assessment and preserve existing QI requirements pending final guidance and any actual waiver approval. Compliance · Due 2026-10-12
Sources
- Draft BHIN, Qualified Individual Waiver Process OptionsOfficial · DHCS · 2026-09-25 · Source review 2026-10-04
- 2026 Behavioral Health Information NoticesOfficial · DHCS · Source review 2026-10-04
Complete edition and supplemental material
This finding in the complete approved report →Regulatory horizons, CIA trends and implementation trackers remain in the full report.
Read the entire Medicare & Medicaid report →