Weekly healthcare intelligenceRegulation · Enforcement · Government payersAll editions →
Complete report · Medicare & Medicaid Sweep

Medicare & Medicaid Sweep, November 4, 2026

Published November 4, 2026Coverage October 25–31, 2026, Pacific

Read this edition’s coverage limitations ↓

Coverage and scope

Coverage limitations: California legislative result-set and bill-history coverage is incomplete under the approved one-edition disclosure. Four CDPH sources were not fully verified. Coverage of DHCS, Medi-Cal, Noridian and named federal sources is also incomplete. Do not interpret a missing item as zero results or complete coverage.

Executive triage

  • Dialysis reimbursement: Review the 2027 ESRD rate, facility-specific adjustments and low-volume eligibility. The December 31 attestation applies to eligible facilities seeking that adjustment; it is not a universal deadline.
  • Oncology and coverage: Compare the revised multiple-myeloma transplant criteria with clinical and coverage workflows; preserve the distinction between single and tandem procedures.
  • Exchange and post-acute teams: Assess the proposed Exchange verification changes and the SNF quality refresh and preview against applicable operations. Proposed rules and voluntary review windows should not be treated as current universal duties.

Changes since the October 18 edition

The ESRD final rule, myeloma decision, SNF quality refresh, SNF consolidated-billing transmittal, revised MPFS instructions, DHCS proposal and Exchange proposal are distinct developments in this draft. The Exchange proposal is separate from the Treasury premium-tax-credit proposal previously reported as GC-2026-0333; their comment dates and mechanisms should not be merged.

The Noridian R7 and R2 notices update earlier findings GC-2026-0119 and GC-2026-0134; the full earlier article tables and current applicable rules remain to be compared. R14026 replaces the named R13960 MPFS instruction; it does not establish closure of other earlier ASP or ZIP instructions. The new ESRD story does not resolve the earlier Medi-Cal dialysis reprocessing item. Omission of a prior finding does not establish completion or unchanged status.

Primary stories

CMS increases the dialysis base rate and changes low-volume, home-training and quality policies for 2027

High priorityNew in this editionRead article →

Scope: The December 31 attestation applies to eligible facilities seeking the 2027 low-volume adjustment. Do not display it as an unconditional deadline; facility-specific pediatric eligibility and final specifications require confirmation.

Summary

CMS set the 2027 Medicare dialysis base rate at $297.52 per treatment and revised low-volume, pediatric, home-training and quality policies. Eligible facilities seeking the 2027 low-volume adjustment face a December 31, 2026 attestation date; individual payment effects depend on facility circumstances.

What changed

CMS finalized the calendar year (CY) 2027 End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Prospective Payment System rule, setting the unadjusted bundled payment base rate at $297.52 per treatment, up from $281.71 in 2026. The retained rule states that the regulations take effect January 1, 2027; later corrections and current legal status remain to be verified. The base rate is a starting point: patient and facility adjustments, geographic wages, applicable training and outlier payments, and other payment rules mean that a particular facility's payment may differ. CMS estimates that Medicare ESRD PPS payments across facilities will rise 2.7% in CY 2027 compared with estimated 2026 payments; that aggregate projection is not a guarantee of the same increase for each provider or of an increase in all-payer revenue.

The $15.81 base-rate increase includes $12.85 for phosphate binders as CMS completes their incorporation into the bundle. CMS applies a 1.00260 wage-index budget-neutrality factor, a combined 0.98864 factor for low-volume, pediatric and training changes, and a 1.9% productivity-adjusted market-basket update. The 1.9% update is the 2.9% market-basket increase less a 1.0 percentage-point productivity adjustment. The resulting calculation is (($281.71 + $12.85) × 1.00260 × 0.98864) × 1.019 = $297.52. The binder addition becomes part of the base rate and is subject to annual PPS updates; CMS states it is not separately repriced each year based on binder prices or utilization.

Low-volume eligibility and the near-term deadline. CMS expands the low-volume payment adjustment (LVPA) to six tiers for eligible facilities furnishing fewer than 8,000 treatments, with larger factors at lower volumes. The final factors range from 1.368 for 0–2,999 treatments to 1.050 for 7,000–7,999 treatments. The rule's eligibility text requires fewer than 8,000 total treatments in each of the three preceding cost-reporting years, subject to specified aggregation and exceptions; the fact sheet describes the tier using median treatments over those years. Eligibility and tier selection are therefore separate checks, and volume alone does not establish eligibility. For payment year 2027, an eligible facility seeking the adjustment must provide its attestation by December 31, 2026.

Pediatric and home dialysis. The temporary pediatric ESRD add-on ends December 31, 2026. CMS revises pediatric case-mix adjusters and extends LVPA to pediatric treatments at facilities meeting the applicable requirements, including a pediatric exception to the common-ownership aggregation rule. Facility-specific eligibility for that exception depends on the rule's applicable conditions. CMS also increases the home and self-dialysis training add-on from $95.60 to $138.00, permits it during the ESRD onset period, and reduces the onset factor from 1.327 to 1.311 to account for overlap. These payment changes are budget neutral; a facility should model its own patient mix rather than assume that every component increases its net payment.

Acute kidney injury is included. For dialysis furnished by ESRD facilities to beneficiaries with acute kidney injury (AKI), CMS sets the CY 2027 base payment at $297.52 before the applicable geographic adjustment and applies the $138 training add-on where applicable. Starting in CY 2027, ESRD facilities must furnish medically necessary phosphate binders to AKI beneficiaries receiving renal dialysis services under the facility's direct care. CMS also explains that the existing ESRD facility conditions for coverage apply to AKI patients using home modalities, including training and backup dialysis support; sending a patient to an emergency department or discharging them to find another provider does not itself satisfy that backup-support obligation.

Quality measurement starts before the payment year. Beginning with payment year (PY) 2029, CMS replaces the hypercalcemia reporting measure with an adult chronic hyperphosphatemia clinical measure; removes the medication reconciliation and healthcare-personnel COVID-19 vaccination reporting measures from the ESRD Quality Incentive Program (QIP); updates the National Healthcare Safety Network bloodstream-infection measure; and changes the domain and measure weights. Removing those measures from the QIP does not by itself eliminate other clinical, documentation, infection-control or regulatory obligations. CMS discusses a possible patient life-goals measure in response to a request for information; it did not adopt that measure in this rule.

In its discussion of the proposal, CMS described monthly EQRS reporting during CY 2027 for PY 2029; final operational reporting specifications and deadlines still need verification. The hyperphosphatemia measure uses a six-month rolling average of pre-dialysis phosphorus values, using the first reported value in the current month and up to five preceding consecutive months. Among the measure's criteria, it excludes patients with fewer than 91 days of ESRD treatment and includes a patient for a facility only when the patient remains there for the full reporting month and preceding five months; other nutritional exclusions also apply. In that proposal discussion, CMS's example for January 2027 uses August 2026 through January 2027 values, making historical data availability relevant before the new performance period starts. Verify the final technical specifications and reporting schedule before implementing a local workflow.

Why it matters

The Medicare ESRD PPS aggregate estimate is not a facility-specific payment guarantee. Eligibility for the low-volume adjustment and its tier are separate checks, and the PY 2029 quality measure depends on historical data and facility continuity. The final technical specifications and operational guidance remain to be checked.

Suggested action

Suggested operational actions, not additional legal duties. Revenue-cycle and finance teams should model the rate and geographic adjustment against actual treatment mix; separately assess LVPA eligibility, ownership aggregation, cost-report history and tier, and prepare the attestation before the specified deadline if seeking payment. Pharmacy, clinical and contracting teams should assess binder procurement, supply and transitions for eligible ESRD and AKI patients. Home-dialysis leaders should review training capacity, billing configuration and backup-support arrangements. Quality and laboratory teams should map the first pre-dialysis monthly phosphorus value into EQRS workflows, check continuity and exclusions, and validate the historical data needed for the rolling measure. Track CMS and Medicare Administrative Contractor implementation guidance, and confirm that any existing requirements remain in force before discontinuing a prior QIP reporting process. These are proposed planning steps, not a claim that CMS mandated each local action.

Sources

CMS revises coverage criteria for autologous transplant in multiple myeloma

Medium priorityNew in this editionRead article →

Scope: The decision retains specific disease and staging conditions. Intervening prior NCD versions, claims implementation and later status remain open.

Summary

CMS revised national coverage criteria for a single autologous transplant in certain patients with active multiple myeloma, subject to specified disease and staging requirements.

What changed

CMS posted its final reconsideration of the multiple-myeloma provision of national coverage determination 110.23 on October 28, 2026, and states that the revised criteria are effective that day. The decision covers a single autologous stem-cell transplant when the patient has active multiple myeloma under the specified International Myeloma Working Group definition and meets an accepted staging requirement. Active disease requires at least 10% monoclonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy-proven bony or extramedullary plasmacytoma, together with at least one SLiM/CRAB myeloma-defining event.

The staging requirement permits any stage under the International Staging System or its revisions, or stage II or III under the Durie-Salmon system. CMS framed reconsideration around prognostic staging tools and outcomes after autologous transplantation. The decision does not cover every transplant or every myeloma diagnosis automatically. Its appendix separately identifies tandem autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma among nationally non-covered indications. Earlier NCD language and claim-processing instructions require further comparison.

Why it matters

Transplant, oncology, utilization review and revenue-cycle teams may need to align coverage documentation with the revised national language. A staging label alone does not satisfy every criterion; individual clinical suitability and other applicable conditions remain separate questions.

Suggested action

Suggested internal action: clinical and coverage owners should compare the new NCD language with transplant authorization and documentation workflows, identify affected cases and staging evidence, and check CMS and Medicare Administrative Contractor implementation instructions before changing billing or authorization procedures. No new CMS deadline for these planning steps is asserted.

Sources

Exchange eligibility verification proposal

Medium priorityNew in this editionRead article →

HHS and CMS proposed changes to Exchange eligibility verification, annual redeterminations and enrollment timing in a rule published October 27. The executive summary describes circumstances in which an Exchange generally could not authorize advance premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions for an otherwise eligible applicant while specified eligibility inconsistencies remain unresolved, subject to a stated family-size special-enrollment exception; other inconsistencies are treated differently. Comments must be received by November 27, 2026, for assured consideration. This is a proposal, not a final rule; the full applicability schedule and all exceptions remain to be reviewed.

The executive summary identifies specified inconsistencies involving citizenship or lawful presence, residence, other minimum essential coverage, household income, family size or eligible noncitizen status. It describes an exception for certain family-size special-enrollment circumstances and different treatment for other data-matching issues; it does not say every inconsistency ends all coverage or assistance.

For annual redetermination of premium tax credit and cost-sharing reduction eligibility, the summary proposes that the enrollee or application filer provide or confirm specified information between August 1 and December 31 of the preceding year, with the Exchange attempting verification. A separate proposed pre-open-enrollment verification period would begin August 1 and end when open enrollment starts; consumers could choose whether to use it. The summary also describes an option to pend plan selection until applicable assistance eligibility is determined, with conditional effective-date and retroactive-enrollment rules.

Why it matters: If finalized, the proposals could affect verification workflows, consumer communications, pending plan selections and the timing of financial assistance. Applicability depends on the final provisions, the Exchange and individual circumstances.

Suggested action: Exchange, issuer and enrollment-assistance teams can compare current verification, notice and escalation processes with the complete proposal, including its definitions, exceptions and applicability dates. These are planning steps, not present implementation duties.

Proposed rule

SNF quality refresh and January preview

Medium priorityNew in this editionRead article →

Scope: The October refresh and the earlier preview notice have different dates and purposes; current preview status and final source checks remain open.

CMS says its October skilled nursing facility quality-data refresh is available, with older Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary data remaining in place. CMS had already announced the spending-data delay in July. Separately, an October 15 notice identifies November 14 for review of January 2027 preview reports, subject to CMS's review and data-correction rules.

In its October 28 update, CMS says the SNF Quality Reporting Program refresh is available on Medicare.gov's compare tool and the Provider Data Catalog. Assessment-based measures reflect SNF data from the first through fourth quarters of 2025; other measures use different periods. CMS says the spending measure, based on fourth-quarter 2022 through third-quarter 2024 data, would not update in October because of delayed claims data. It anticipates releasing updated provider scores based on fourth-quarter 2023 through third-quarter 2025 data in the January 2027 refresh. The January release is a stated plan, not an observed completion.

CMS had already described that same delay and planned January update in its July 15 provider-preview notice. The October 28 development is the announced availability of the October refresh and a renewed explanation, not a newly announced delay.

CMS's October 15 entry says January 2027 provider preview reports are available and identifies November 14, 2026 for facilities to review their data. Providers may request CMS review during the preview period if they believe their displayed scores are inaccurate. CMS says assessment updates submitted after the final submission deadline will not appear in the preview reports or on Medicare.gov; corrections it agrees to make appear in a subsequent quarterly release. Facilities should verify the actual report, current deadline, submission deadlines and CMS review procedure rather than assume the preview reopens data submission. No new payment duty or rate is established.

CMS SNF QRP Public Reporting

Reminder: DMEPOS order and prior-authorization lists

Medium priorityConditional reminderRead article →

The July 30 notice set October 28, 2026 as the general implementation date for its DMEPOS list updates. It adds 22 specified HCPCS codes to the face-to-face encounter and written-order-before-delivery list and separately adds eight specified codes to the required prior-authorization list. Prior authorization for specified upper-limb orthoses is phased, starting October 28 in California, Florida, Michigan and New York; later phases are January 26 and April 26, 2027. The date’s arrival does not itself establish actual implementation; exact codes, exceptions and later amendments remain open.

Suggested owner and action: DMEPOS suppliers, enrollment and billing teams can check the applicable HCPCS codes, geographic phases, exceptions and current instructions before changing ordering or delivery workflows.

July Federal Register notice

Context

Context: OIG review of four state nursing-home spending requirements

Context and reference material

An HHS OIG audit issued October 21 and posted October 28 examined how Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania implemented their own nursing-home resident-care spending requirements. The four states used different measures and financial denominators. OIG selected 20 facilities in each state; 42 of the 76 interviewed reported challenges. That selected group cannot establish national prevalence. OIG recommended that CMS consider the findings while implementing Medicaid payment-transparency reporting and in any future rulemaking if it chooses to establish a minimum; CMS concurred. The report states there was no federal minimum spending requirement at the time of its review.

OIG audit

Additional developments and forward horizon

Prior-duty update: California rural health funding

Medium priorityUpdatedRead article →

On October 29, CMS said California had committed its full fiscal-year 2026 rural-health funding, more than $233 million, to programs across the state. This updates the same funding story as prior finding GC-2026-0329, which reported a $233,639,308.47 first-budget-period award and $219,133,495 put to work through July 31 based on earlier state-reported obligations. The October announcement should not be added to that award as separate new funding or treated as proof of disbursement to particular providers.

Suggested owner and action: Rural-health strategy, finance and compliance teams can compare the current state program and eligibility terms with their organization’s plans and track subsequent reporting; the announcement does not itself establish a provider application or payment.

CMS California announcement | Prior obligated-funds report

Cell and Gene Therapy Access Model

Lower priorityNew in this editionRead article →

Review qualification: The planned expansion is voluntary and prospective; no completed application process or agreement is asserted.

CMS said October 27 that it plans to broaden its voluntary Cell and Gene Therapy Access Model beyond its initial sickle-cell focus. The agency expects to release a request for manufacturer applications in the coming months and describes negotiating outcomes-based agreements on behalf of participating state Medicaid programs.

Applicability and suggested action: State Medicaid, specialty pharmacy and payer contracting teams can monitor the future manufacturer application and participation terms and assess potential relevance; no agreement or coverage expansion for additional therapies is established by the announcement.

CMS Innovation Insight

Nursing-home MDS validation panel

Lower priorityNew in this editionRead article →

CMS opened nominations October 30 for a technical expert panel on a developing process to validate nursing homes’ Minimum Data Set information. The agency says nominations close November 30, 2026, and the panel will consider potential effects on quality scoring, payment and public reporting. Nomination is voluntary; no final methodology or new reporting or payment duty is established.

Applicability and suggested action: Nursing-home quality and MDS leaders interested in voluntary participation can review the panel’s nomination requirements and submit by November 30 if they choose; no reporting duty arises from a nomination.

CMS panel listing

Prior-duty update: Noridian A57079 R7

Medium priorityUpdatedRead article →

Noridian’s October 29 Jurisdiction E Part B notice reports an A57079 revision effective November 1, 2026. It says the Group 1 medical-necessity asterisk explanation specifies diagnosis M72.0 for CPT 20527 and 26341. This R7 notice follows the R6 conformity update described in our October 11 finding; the notice does not determine an individual claim’s medical necessity or payment. The current complete article and earlier R6 table were not reviewed here.

Applicability and suggested action: Affected Jurisdiction E billing and clinical teams can compare the revised notice with the current article and their applicable documentation and medical-necessity rules before changing claim edits.

Noridian R7 notice

Prior-duty update: Noridian A60217 R2

Medium priorityUpdatedRead article →

Noridian’s October 29 Jurisdiction E notice says revision R2 to billing and coding article A60217 adds 0665U to Group 1 for specified liver-disease biomarker testing, effective October 1, 2026. Noridian cautions that a code’s inclusion does not automatically mean coverage. This is a potential update to the October 11 finding GC-2026-0134; compare the current article and LCD with the earlier version before treating it as a material change. The current complete article, LCD and registry details remain open.

Applicability and suggested action: Affected molecular diagnostics and billing teams can compare the article, associated LCD and any applicable registry requirements before changing workflows; a listed code alone does not establish coverage.

Noridian A60217 notice

Additional context for editorial review

CMS program-integrity contractor process

Context and reference material

CMS issued Transmittal R14002PI, CR 14654, on October 26 concerning UPIC and I-MEDIC beneficiary-complaint resolution processes. The transmittal states an effective and implementation date of November 27, 2026. CMS describes contractor technical processes and says there is no change to the provider or beneficiary population and no provider education is required; this is not a new provider filing deadline. The earlier source view supports this bounded context, not a complete review of all program-integrity notices or subsequent implementation.

Suggested owner and action: Program-integrity and compliance teams can monitor the applicable contractor process and assess relevance to their own complaint handling; confirm the current transmittal before making operational changes.

CMS R14002PI

HHVBP performance-report review

Context and reference material

CMS’s October 2026 expanded Home Health Value-Based Purchasing appeals guide describes a report-specific recalculation request within 15 calendar days after issuance of a preliminary interim performance report or preview annual performance report. For annual reports, it describes reconsideration for an agency that submitted a recalculation request and disagrees with the result, and Administrator review only after a reconsideration request, with seven calendar days from notice of the reconsideration decision for that latter step. The process addresses calculation discrepancies, not underlying submitted-data errors. It is distinct from home health QRP noncompliance reconsideration. The guide’s first posting date and current applicability are unverified; check the actual report and notice rather than treating these intervals as universal calendar deadlines.

Suggested owner and action: Home-health quality and reimbursement teams can check their own performance report and current CMS instructions, distinguishing report-calculation disputes from underlying submitted-data errors and QRP noncompliance appeals.

CMS expanded HHVBP appeals guide

Louisiana Medicaid capitation audit

Context and reference material

OIG examined Louisiana managed-care capitation payments for incarcerated enrollees in October 2022–September 2024. In a stratified random sample of 100 enrollees, it found $143,459 in unallowable payments for 46; for the audited population it estimated at least $3.7 million, including $2,690,745 in federal share, using the lower limit of a two-sided 90% confidence interval. OIG recommended refunding the estimated federal share and promptly suspending managed-care enrollment after incarceration notifications. Louisiana agreed and described actions, including working to return the appropriate federal share; that does not establish repayment. Medicaid eligibility and managed-care enrollment are distinct, and the report discusses exceptions and later law. First public posting and later status remain unverified; this state audit should not be generalized nationally.

OIG report page | OIG audit OAS-25-04-100

Suggested owner and action: Medicaid eligibility and managed-care teams can assess incarceration notification, enrollment suspension and capitation reconciliation workflows where relevant; this Louisiana audit does not establish other states’ error rates.

The following material is retained for assessment; where noted, timing, source status or applicability remains unresolved.

OIG outpatient drug code mapping

Context and reference material

Source qualification: The report was listed October 28, while a separate index identifies an October 23 issue date. Its first public posting was not independently established. It is included as audit context rather than a confirmed new in-window development.

OIG analyzed Medicare Part B outpatient drug claims with service dates from April 1, 2024 through March 31, 2025. It identified 160,918 claim lines involving 577 distinct procedure codes that did not match the procedure codes associated with the drug codes on those lines under the crosswalk files. This is OIG's selected mismatch population, not all Medicare outpatient drug claims. OIG's What's New listing displayed the report on October 28; a separate indexed report list identified October 23 as the issue date. Those dates have different meanings and neither alone establishes the first public posting.

Of the outpatient drugs in the mismatch analysis, six procedure codes were associated with 62%, and critical-access and short-term acute-care hospitals billed 99%, according to OIG. OIG reviewed a separate nonstatistical sample of 30 claim lines; it found incorrect procedure codes on 24 and varying drug-code or procedure-code results on the remaining six. That small selected sample cannot establish an error rate for the full mismatch population. For the 160,918-line analysis, OIG did not determine whether overpayments or underpayments occurred. Separately, it calculated that 11 of the 24 sample lines with incorrect procedure codes, paid under the hospital outpatient prospective payment system, could have produced net improper payments of $1,304; the other 13 were paid under different payment systems. The sample calculation is not an estimated improper-payment total for the full mismatch population or proof of recovery.

OIG identified potential vulnerabilities in CMS and Medicare Administrative Contractor oversight: no system edits during the audited period to ensure correct procedure-code matching and provider education that did not address the relevant crosswalk matching. The data brief contains no specific recommendations to CMS. The observed findings do not determine a particular provider's claim or establish fraud, an overall improper-payment amount, a new provider deadline or current implementation of corrective measures.

Applicability and suggested action: Hospital pharmacy, chargemaster and billing teams can compare drug-to-procedure-code crosswalk controls and a risk-based sample of their own outpatient claims. OIG’s selected sample is not an error rate for any particular organization.

OIG data brief OAS-25-09-090

FFE unauthorized enrollment processes

Context and reference material

Review qualification: This describes the manual’s process, not a newly established issue-week requirement or an instruction to cancel any particular policy. Current applicability remains open.

CMS’s October 2026 Federally-facilitated Exchange enrollment manual describes separate routes for consumer-reported and issuer-reported suspected unauthorized enrollments. For an issuer-originated case without a consumer complaint, the manual describes at least two contact attempts using different methods, a 30-day period after the second notice, and CMS review, subject to the stated conditions and exceptions. Suspected unauthorized enrollment does not itself establish that a particular policy should be canceled.

Applicability and suggested action: Issuer enrollment and compliance teams using the federally facilitated Exchange can compare current escalation and consumer-notice workflows with the applicable manual and confirm current CMS instructions before changing an issuer procedure.

CMS FFE enrollment manual

CMS issuer agent-of-record guidance

Context and reference material

In guidance dated October 27, CMS advised qualified health plan issuers not to allow an agent or broker whose national producer number was absent from the original enrollment data CMS sent the issuer to claim enrollment credit afterward through an agent- or broker-of-record form. CMS says issuers may still work with agents, brokers and CMS on legitimate book-of-business transfers, and lawful contractual compensation arrangements may continue. The guidance concerns the federally facilitated Exchange and, unless otherwise indicated, state exchanges using the federal platform. Its posting and implementation dates remain unverified.

Applicability and suggested action: Issuer enrollment and broker-relations teams can review their enrollment-credit and transfer procedures against current CMS guidance, while preserving legitimate transfers and lawful compensation arrangements.

CMS issuer guidance

CMS subsidy matching notice

Context and reference material

An October 29 CMS notice describes re-establishing an existing federal and state-administering-entity matching program used for health-subsidy eligibility and enrollment verification. Agencies must verify findings before specified adverse benefit actions; a match alone is not automatic termination. The notice’s stated term dates conflict with its prospective commencement language, so the actual term remains unresolved. This does not assert a new matching program or a particular adverse action.

Applicability and suggested action: Relevant administering agencies can verify the actual program term and applicable notice and verification steps before relying on a match for an adverse action.

CMS matching notice

Forward horizon

The following dates are source-stated or reported in the earlier edition, subject to later changes, applicable exceptions and current source confirmation. Suggested functions are not assigned individuals.

Near term

  • November 3, now past: DHCS’s current BHIN index identifies this as the feedback date for its PSC-35 draft. The linked draft retains inconsistent identifiers and an unspecified effective date; it does not establish an operative policy change. Behavioral-health policy teams should retain existing procedures unless changed by final guidance.
  • November 4, 11 a.m. Eastern (16:00 UTC), now past: CMS-listed response cutoff for its voluntary fraud-defense contractor RFI. The underlying SAM notice and amendments remained unreadable; no later amendment or extension was verified. CMS fraud-defense information | October 29 MLN Connects
  • November 14: The earlier SNF notice identified the review date for the January 2027 preview. Quality teams should confirm their actual report and CMS instructions; this is separate from the October refresh.
  • November 23, 2026: An agency receiving a home-health QRP noncompliance letter may request reconsideration by the stated 11:59 p.m. deadline; check the actual notice and time zone.
  • November 27: The Exchange proposal states the comment date for assured consideration. The separate Treasury proposal had a reported November 30 comment date and a conditional December 8 hearing; confirm current status.
  • November 30: CMS’s MDS panel nomination opportunity is voluntary; no provider reporting duty follows from nomination.

Later dates

  • December 15: The earlier Medicare Advantage/PBM proposal reported a 5 p.m. Eastern comment deadline. Managed-care and legal teams should verify later status; proposed phases are not final rules.
  • December 31, 2026: Eligible facilities seeking the 2027 ESRD low-volume adjustment must meet the stated attestation condition; applicability and exceptions require facility-specific review.
  • February 1 and May 1, 2027: Prior Medi-Cal notices reported separate claim-NPI and active-enrollment phases for affected providers. Revenue-cycle and enrollment teams should confirm current manuals, applicability and any exceptions; the historical dates do not prove the edits were implemented.

Coverage limitations: Some Medicare contractor coverage/billing notices, Medi-Cal CAMMIS entries, QPP virtual-group material and the underlying SAM RFI notice/amendments were not fully verified. California payer/regulator screening also had limits. This report describes the documents actually reviewed and does not establish that no additional updates, exceptions or extensions exist. It does not guarantee coverage or payment. Medi-Cal news | QPP virtual groups | CMS fraud-defense information

Privacy preferences

Where enabled for this site, Cloudflare Web Analytics can send page-use and performance measurements to Cloudflare. This panel provides information and does not turn analytics on or off.

This panel stores no tracking choice and does not change your tool saves, screening, resets, reports or exports. Other sites have separate settings.

Read Privacy & Cookies