Compliance SweepBack to stories →
← Back to stories
Payment & health plan rulesNew in this edition

Cal/OSHA proposes higher boiler and pressure-vessel inspection and permit fees

The October 15 emergency proposal would raise specified inspection charges from $150 to $180 per hour and permit-processing fees from $45 to $55. Covered equipment, services and public-entity exemptions matter. The operative package makes effectiveness conditional on Secretary of State filing.

Illustrative artwork. Fictional scene, not a photograph of the people or events in this story.

What happened

Cal/OSHA issued an October 15, 2026 notice proposing emergency amendments to title 8 sections 344, 344.1 and 344.2. Specified shop, field and resale inspection services under section 344(a), and permit inspections and qualifying follow-up inspections under section 344.1(a) and (b), would increase from $150 to $180 per hour. Processing each permit to operate under section 344.2(b) would increase from $45 to $55. The proposed text retains billing for travel time and upward rounding to quarter-hour increments.

The notice concerns covered tanks and boilers and distinguishes equipment exemptions from the Government Code section 6103 prohibition on charging these inspection and permit fees for equipment owned or operated by public entities. The proposed text retains the follow-up fee exception when safety-order requirements are met, and the Division notified, within 15 days of the compliance date on the preliminary order. Its existing penalty provisions concern fees unpaid within 60 days of the invoice date and equal 100 percent of the unpaid fee; these are not newly proposed penalty increases. Labor Code section 7721(e), quoted in the notice, exempts these emergency fee regulations from OAL review and approval and makes them effective immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State. The notice supplies no completed filing date or public-comment closing date, so these documents establish a proposal without establishing that the higher charges were already effective.

Scope and timing

Authority status
Proposed
Applicability
Operationally relevant
Audience
Health systems, Provider networks
Jurisdiction
California
Responsible owner
Compliance

Why it matters

Private healthcare facilities with covered equipment and services may face higher inspection and permit costs. Equipment-specific exceptions and public-entity fee exemptions require an applicability check before budgeting or changing payment instructions.

Implementation playbook

  1. Recommended internal target: inventory potentially covered equipment and identify equipment or public-entity fee exemptions. Clinical Operations · Due 2026-10-23
  2. Recommended internal target: confirm actual Secretary of State filing and effective status before updating inspection budgets or payment instructions. Finance · Due 2026-10-23

Sources

Complete edition and supplemental material

This finding in the complete approved report →

Regulatory horizons, CIA trends and implementation trackers remain in the full report.

Read the entire Compliance Sweep report →

← Return to stories

Privacy preferences

Where enabled for this site, Cloudflare Web Analytics can send page-use and performance measurements to Cloudflare. This panel provides information and does not turn analytics on or off.

This panel stores no tracking choice and does not change your tool saves, screening, resets, reports or exports. Other sites have separate settings.

Read Privacy & Cookies