Enforcement BriefingBack to stories →
← Back to stories
Billing fraud & false claimsNew in this edition

Physician faces pending FCA complaint over neurostimulator billing

A pending FCA suit alleges Michael Neret billed nearly $500,000 for surgical neurostimulator implants while staff instead applied inexpensive electro-acupuncture devices in office sessions.

What happened

DOJ announced September 29, 2026 a False Claims Act lawsuit alleging that Bay City physician Michael Neret fraudulently billed Medicare nearly $500,000 for surgical neurostimulator electrode implantations. Neret owns and manages Neret MD Medical Clinic. The complaint is a pending civil matter; the release expressly states that its claims are allegations and liability has not been determined. It should be classified as a civil complaint rather than a judgment.

The alleged mismatch concerns procedures billed as complex surgery requiring an operating room versus brief in-office sessions using inexpensive electro-acupuncture devices. According to the complaint, nonphysician practitioners and nonclinical staff inserted small wires into the skin and secured devices behind patients' ears. DOJ also alleges Neret knew the devices were not billable and used the procedures to justify narcotic prescribing. These details support comparison of codes, actual devices, setting, personnel and clinical documentation. They do not establish that the physician has been convicted or that every neurostimulator procedure is improper.

Scope and timing

Authority status
Pending litigation
Applicability
Operationally relevant
Audience
Health systems, Provider networks
Jurisdiction
Federal

Why it matters

Procedure names and billed codes must match the actual device, clinical work and setting; superficial descriptions can conceal a materially different service.

Case details

agencies
U.S. Department of Justice
entities
Michael Neret, Neret MD Medical Clinic
action Type
Civil complaint
event Date
2026-09-29
alleged Conduct
DOJ alleges nearly $500,000 in Medicare billing for surgical neurostimulator electrode implantations. The complaint remains pending; liability has not been determined.
resolution
Charges or complaint pending; no determination of guilt or liability.

Operational lessons

  • Compare procedure codes with clinical records, devices and place-of-service evidence; escalate unsupported surgical billing.

Sources

Complete edition and supplemental material

This finding in the complete approved report →

Regulatory horizons, CIA trends and implementation trackers remain in the full report.

Read the entire Enforcement Briefing report →

← Return to stories

Privacy preferences

Where enabled for this site, Cloudflare Web Analytics can send page-use and performance measurements to Cloudflare. This panel provides information and does not turn analytics on or off.

This panel stores no tracking choice and does not change your tool saves, screening, resets, reports or exports. Other sites have separate settings.

Read Privacy & Cookies